On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:01:39 +0200, Marcin Orlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd rather expect DENIED_IDENTICAL_SENDER_RECIPIENT to appear > in logs, as such filter definitely "costs" less than > DNS queries. I tried to find filter chain described in the > manual, but seems there's no such information. Sam, wouldn't > be much better to have order reversed here? I now also spotted that when you enablie any BLs, these are also queried before reject-identical-sender-recipient is checked - so I second myself :) reject-identical-sender-recipient shall be evaluated prior performing any other blocking filters simply for faster processing Regards, -- "Daddy, what "Formatting drive C:" means?"... Marcin http://wfmh.org.pl/carlos/ _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
