Carlo can you send the log file?

Nightduke


2008/5/22, Carlo Blohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had the same problem, but i dont know why it is coming.... I guess it is 
> specialy when the server is on 100% cpu and many mails are coming to the 
> server.....but I can't reproduce this error exactly.
>
> Now I try to prevent 100% cpu for a longer time, I hope that helps.
>
>
> My regards,
>
> Carlo Blohm
>
>
>
> Maus Computer
> C. Jesse
> Dorfstr. 17
> 16356 Ahrensfelde
> Tel. : 030 666 480 30
> Fax : 030 666 480 33
> Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von John Barton
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 23:27
> An: spamdyke users
> Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] Email messages that only contain thework "QUIT"
>
> Sam Clippinger wrote:
> > That's very strange -- I'm having a hard time imagining any way
> > spamdyke could be injecting "QUIT" into a message like that.  The only
> > time spamdyke injects "QUIT" at all is when a connection times out,
> > but then it sends a "." first to end the message.  The "QUIT" should
> > be interpreted as an SMTP command.
> >
> > Do your logs show timeouts that correspond with these messages?  Are
> > any other parts of the message corrupted (e.g. the headers)?
> >
> > -- Sam Clippinger
> >
> >
> I will try to go back through my logs and correlate the occurrences with a 
> timeout. The headers do appear to be incorrect as well, though, the  From 
> address in the header shows up as [EMAIL PROTECTED] -John
>
> > John Barton wrote:
> >
> >> I have started to receive multiple reports of people getting email
> >> messages, from various senders, and the message body only contains
> >> the word "QUIT". At first people thought that someone wanted them to
> >> quit their job, but finally it was reported to me and I think that
> >> something is causing SMTP messages to get mangled and somehow the final 
> >> "QUIT"
> >> command gets placed into the body of the email, with nothing else. I
> >> have just enabled full logging on my spamdyke installation, but since
> >> I have never experienced the problem myself and rely on an end user
> >> to report the problem, I don't know how long it may take to collect
> >> data from one of these transactions. I am curious if anyone else has
> >> ever experienced this, and if anyone has a suggestion on what the
> >> cause could be. I am pretty confident that this never happened before
> >> I started using spamdyke, but I also believe that I was using
> >> spamdyke for quite a while before this issue came up. Perhaps one of
> >> the version upgrades triggered it? Here is my config information, any help 
> >> is appreciated:
> >>
> >> Host: CentOS 5.1 32 system
> >> Netqmail 1.05 with vpopmail, built following guides on shupp dot org
> >> Spamdyke version 3.1.7
> >>
> >> My spamdyke.conf:
> >>
> >> log-level=2
> >> idle-timeout-secs=120
> >> local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> >> tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> >> reject-missing-sender-mx
> >> reject-empty-rdns
> >> check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org
> >> graylist-min-secs=300
> >> graylist-max-secs=1814400
> >> ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/spamdyke-ip-whitelist
> >> max-recipients=25
> >> graylist-dir=/var/qmail/vpopmail/spamdyke-graylist
> >> never-graylist-ip-file=/var/qmail/control/spamdyke-never-graylist-ips
> >> sender-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/vpopmail/blacklist_senders
> >> sender-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/vpopmail/whitelist_senders
> >> recipient-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/vpopmail/blacklist_recipients
> >> full-log-dir=/mnt/spamdyke-debug
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -John
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> spamdyke-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > spamdyke-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to