[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]Thursday, January 29, 2004, 8:24:15 PM, I wrote:
RM> Even better, since it will catch use of this address in a TO, CC, and/or RM> From header, might be: RM> ... RM> I don't yet have stats for this meta rule (I haven't even linted it yet). Found lint problem. Fixed. Ran. Section 3 -- Frequencies Log (First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies) OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME 97268 79437 17831 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 1058 1058 0 1.000 1.00 9.00 RM_bmastgr OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 97268 79437 17831 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 100.000 81.6682 18.3318 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) 1.088 1.3319 0.0000 1.000 1.00 9.00 RM_bmastgr This meta rule hits 1.33% of my spam corpus, and none of my ham. header __RM_bmastgr1 Received =~ /for bmastgr\@/ header __RM_bmastgr2 ToCc =~ /\bbmastgr\@/ header __RM_bmastgr3 From =~ /\bbmastgr\@/ header __RM_bmastgr4 Envelope-to =~ /\bbmastgr\@/ header __RM_bmastgr5 Subject =~ /\bbmastgr\b/ meta RM_bmastgr ( __RM_bmastgr1 || __RM_bmastgr2 || _RM_bmastgr3 || RM_bmastgr4 || _RM_bmastgr5 ) describe RM_bmastgr Directed to/from invalid address often used by spammers score RM_bmastgr 9.000 # 1058s/0h of 97268 corpus (79437s/17831h) 01/29/04 Bob Menschel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
