On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:44:36 -0500, Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not saying that the domain should be forgotten, but that iit > > should at least be in a different list. > > > > 'Bigevil.cf' -- never once seen in ham. > > 'Maybeevil.cf' -- a small number of hits in ham > > > > Scott > > That would be nice, but its hard enough to do one file :) I've got a prototype for testing that can convert a list of domains into automatically built rules. Add and remove from the source file and automatically build the rules files? Would that ease the administration burden? > I really do want zero FPs. I don't want to see Bigevil committing false advertising. Before, it was billed as zero FP's, and thank you for announcing that that has changed. > I have not posted others like this. I really want people like > playaudiomessage.com to put a stop to spammers usage. Definitely fishy, and that is definitely a desireable property. However, the fishiness of a domain is not what we're talking about, but rather the nature of what BigEvil is supposed to be. >From what you've shown, the evidence is compelling to put playaudiomessage at +2. But I'd want to put the zero fp domains at +4. Scott ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
