On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Peter McGarvey wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I have a mailserver which handles all my incomming and outgoing mail.
>
> Outgoing mail (stuff I send) is passed to the server via ASMTP.
> Incomming mail (stuff sent to me) comes in via SMTP. There is
> absolutely no way my server will relay mail unless it arrives via ASMTP.
>
> However, when I send mail to another account on my box, the global
> SpamAssassin (2.61) adds 2.546 to my mail score because I happen to
> catch the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule. Now, I'm happy for all SMTP mail to
> face up to this rule, but I'd rather my ASMTP mail didn't.
>
> Other than obsfucating my Received: headers to omit the IP from mail
> which is sent via ASMTP, is there any way to get RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK to
> backoff?
>
> I did think about adding trusted networks. But I don't necisarrily know
> my IP. It also blunts SA somewhat if I add vast tracts of IP space.
Silly question; if it's something that you're sending out, why
SA scan it at all?
I configured our MTA to recognize locally generated messages and not
bother SA scanning them. (reduces LLuser complaints about message
sending delays ;).
Dave
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
