On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:12, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam.txt > > It also slipped right by Mailscanner on another host, but I'm surprised > that it scored 0.0 on my SA setup (backhair, weeds, everything in > rules_du_jour)
FWIW, here's what it scored on my system: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 HOSTED_AT_CHINANET=2 HOSTED_IN_CHINA=3 LOCAL_OBFU_ONLY_VGR=1.8 LOCAL_OBFU_VGR=1.8 autolearn=no version=2.60 The HOSTED_AT and HOSTED_IN are from a patch to SA 2.60 that was posted a few months back that looks up spamvertised urls in certain blackholes (those CHINA* scores are indeed very high; I've been meaning to lower them, but I'm not very motivated since I haven't personally seen any false positives yet) The LOCAL_OBFU are generated from http://sandgnat.com/cmos/ HTH -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases (0BFU$C/\TED SPA/\/\ P|-|RA$ES): http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
