Forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include me in your reply as I am not yet subscribed.
Cheers, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Forwarded Message----- From: Ron Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: spamassassin and evolution Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:05:55 +1100 here is a mystery... Both my wife and I use spamassassin from within evolution by piping emails to "spamc -c" and checking for the return value to classify as spam or not, as written up by others. When running evolution and spamassassin on my notebook (like I do when I work on-site at times), spamassassin has about 97% success rate. However, running these on a desktop server instead of on the notebook, that rate is only about 30-35%. Both are RH9 up2date, same version of evolution and spamassassin installed (latest from www.spamassassin.org). They have identical /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and ~/.spamassassin/*. The evolution directories are the same (just copying them in full across to another hard disk). No configuration beyond rpm -Uvh ... on either computer. The notebook is a P2 celeron 400MHz and the server a P3 Celeron, 1GHz so there is a clear speed difference and spamc should be able to (better) cope on the server... Clearly, there got to be a difference somewhere. Would anyone be able to guess where I should look for this difference? I get a fair amount of spam and it is a real nuisance to have to go through 50-60 emails per day! Cheers, Ron -- Ron Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
