Hello Pierre,
Saturday, January 17, 2004, 6:28:37 PM, you wrote:
PT> Bob,
PT> Thanks for the mass check. I don't have a big corpus handy,
PT> just what trickles through the gateway.
PT> There should be no problem with a few extra keywords; we could
PT> even squeeze "postmaster" in there for good measure, though rules
PT> which line-wrap sometimes cause grief for text downloads.
>>Also, the valid HTML tags are valid regardless of case, eg:
>><BLOCKQUOTE> is a valid HTML tag, but excluded in your rule.
PT> My original test only looks for lowercase strings, so there is
PT> no need to make exceptions for valid uppercase tags. So far I have
PT> only seen lowercase bogus tags in spam. How does an overall /i
PT> modifier affect inverse matches anyhow? Will your version match
PT> <HAIRSPRAY> and not match <BLOCKQUOTE> ?
Good point. I've removed the /i from my copy. Results:
rawbody PT_BOGUS_HTML
/\<\/?(?!(?:blockquote|optiongroup|plaintext|fontfamily|underline))[a-z]{9,15}\>/
describe PT_BOGUS_HTML random long words disguised as HTML tags
score PT_BOGUS_HTML 4.000 # 9628s/2h of 92209 corpus (74874s/17335h) 01/17/04
Bob Menschel
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
