> > There was an excellent presentation by John Graham-Cumming at the > 2004 Spam Conference about this and how your experience is what most > people find. The issue being that spammers don't know what tokens are > considered hammy in your Bayes DB, so random dictionary words tend to fail > very easily and other "bayes poison" doesn't usually get that far either. >
Any one have a pointer to a web-blog, or "trip report" somewhere summarizing what went on at the Spam Conference 2004? ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
