Adam has gone through the set and 'graded my paper'.
- the "'" was missing in rules ending in {2}
- added "d" to higher up rules ending in {1} (proper names...doh)
- he pointed out some extraneous 'code'
- on an earlier edit (not announced) he explained the need for speed
using ?: in the capturing (), so I fixed those.
I put the rules at sort of a midway score. I know you can (and should
at least to start) change them, but I can't quite decide where to start
them in the file. I think, as I believe someone said earlier, maybe
chris, with any rules you're trying out that someone else wrote, you
should score them low until you see how they do, then adjust them based
on your needs. We all have good intentions, but this isn't easy stuff
and we're bound to make mistakes or have oversights. ...which is the
whole point of this list and doing this as a team. :)
Thank you again Adam, and to everyone else who has given such good
suggestions! It's getting there.
Jennifer
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
