i like this idea,

possibley even design a DCC / pyzor / razor type system which would
implement a distributed checksum / md5 etc
on all image ?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Manuel Schmitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Improvement: Image Recognition as spam criteria


> Dear readers,
>
> while using Spamassassin for about one month and having a very good
> recognition rate I am discovering that spam that has almost or no text
> within does not get detected by SpamAssassin, neither by normal criteria
nor
> by the Bayes filter. I think because there is not enough information for
the
> Bayes filter to be able on a reliable decision.
>
> Now I had the following thought. What about a special image database which
> is maintained in a Bayes-like-style. I could imagine the following. While
> learning spam with sa-learn, the learning process could also filter out
each
> image in an email. Then we have to build a more unique representation of
> this image, comparable with a hash value of a string. Then we store this
> "hash value" as entry a Bayes-like image database. When new email comes in
> we do a comparison of all images in this email with them in our database.
>
> I don't have any idea of what resouces this addition check(s) would
consume,
> but perhaps it would be a nice addition feature. I was concerned about
some
> ways how to get a hash value out of an image, if someone is interested,
feel
> free to contact me.
>
> Best regards,
> Manuel Schmitt




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to