> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McGroarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] filter suggestions
> 
> 
> What's the proper way to suggest a new filter to the SA developers?
> 
> I'm getting a TON of mail with a bunch of random uncommon-but-real
> words to thwart Bayesian filtering, combined with a single picture
> link. Spamassassin is giving these only about one point apiece.
> 
> The picture link never seems to come from the same domain as the
> mail. It seems like HTML mail with images not from the sender's domain
> would be a very useful test for these.
> 

There has been some serious effort to _reliably_ tagg this stuff. The rule
consortium works to get the lowest FP rate possible. Otherwise Bob M. slaps
us all with a dead fish! ;)

We have yet to come up with a great set of rules or evals yet. Some
progress, but we have to anticipate the changes spammers will make. I'm
hoping we strike gold soon. I think Fred is begining to dream in random
words only. 

--Chris


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to