Earlier, I wrote:
> > I came up with a set of rules which appear to catch the
> > new strain of spam with a meaningless jumble of words in
> > the body, while hopefully not catching any legitimate mail.
Rubin Bennett replied:
> I believe that the Backhair Ruleset will catch these as well;
Not necessarily. I installed the Backhair rules after seeing Rubin's
posting, but I've still seen several "mPOP Web-Mail" spam messages
(four so far in the last couple of days) that would not have been
identified as spam on the basis of Backhair alone.
I saw one with the following garbage, for example --
<p>Fr</arbitrage>ee Ca</hook>ble^ TV</p>
-- which matched only one Backhair test (J_BACKHAIR_22).
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.richw.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
