BH> Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH> > 
BH> > Alan Munday wrote:
BH> > >
BH> > > Is anyone finding pyzor reporting a bit hit and miss?
BH> > 
BH> > Just got my first spam in days today.  Taught Bayes, 
BH> reported to Razor2,
BH> > and you reminded me about Pyzor.  I got:
BH> > 
BH> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pyzor report --mbox</var/mail/bhoover
BH> > 66.250.40.33:24441      (200, 'OK')
BH> > 
BH> > I'd tested reporting a couple days ago, and I got the 
BH> same results --
BH> > that is, looks good to me, and no timeout.
BH> 
BH> I should qualify this though -- there was only one mail in 
BH> the box.  I
BH> wonder if that's having any effect in your situation.  You 
BH> might want to
BH> try a few single mails to see if
BH> there's any difference -- it's possible Pyzor's multi-mail behavior,
BH> and/or your system do not agree, that is.

The original mbox had only 4 messages in it.

I ran some more through last night >100 and Pyzor failed to report 12% of
them.

Alan




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to