BH> Bryan Hoover wrote: BH> > BH> > Alan Munday wrote: BH> > > BH> > > Is anyone finding pyzor reporting a bit hit and miss? BH> > BH> > Just got my first spam in days today. Taught Bayes, BH> reported to Razor2, BH> > and you reminded me about Pyzor. I got: BH> > BH> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pyzor report --mbox</var/mail/bhoover BH> > 66.250.40.33:24441 (200, 'OK') BH> > BH> > I'd tested reporting a couple days ago, and I got the BH> same results -- BH> > that is, looks good to me, and no timeout. BH> BH> I should qualify this though -- there was only one mail in BH> the box. I BH> wonder if that's having any effect in your situation. You BH> might want to BH> try a few single mails to see if BH> there's any difference -- it's possible Pyzor's multi-mail behavior, BH> and/or your system do not agree, that is.
The original mbox had only 4 messages in it. I ran some more through last night >100 and Pyzor failed to report 12% of them. Alan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk