Hello Brent,

Thursday, January 8, 2004, 2:10:15 PM, you wrote:

BJN> (the RND_UC_CHAR pattern) and I've just updated it for a few new variants
BJN> that have shown up in the past couple of days.  The second one,
BJN> x_headers.cf, builds on the ideas in the thread "X-Mailer is totally
BJN> bogus" on this list.  I've collected enough of these to find some very
BJN> consistent header patterns:

BJN> Feedback very welcome!

Section 3 -- Frequencies Log
(First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)

XMAILERBOGUS2 looks real good.  RATWR1 works.  The X-header rules looks
workable, but simply doesn't match any email in my corpus.

OVERALL     SPAM      HAM     S/O   SCORE  NAME
  87289    70035    17254    0.802   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
    225      225        0    1.000   1.00   3.00  BCS_XMAILERBOGUS2
     77       77        0    1.000   1.00   5.00  BCS_RATWR1
      0        0        0    0.500   0.00   3.00  BCS_X_MT
      0        0        0    0.500   0.00   3.00  BCS_X_TRI


OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
  87289    70035    17254    0.802   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
100.000  80.2335  19.7665    0.802   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
  0.258   0.3213   0.0000    1.000   1.00    3.00  BCS_XMAILERBOGUS2
  0.088   0.1099   0.0000    1.000   1.00    5.00  BCS_RATWR1
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.00    3.00  BCS_X_MT
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.00    3.00  BCS_X_TRI

  Bob Menschel




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to