On January 08, 2004 10:24 pm, Raquel Rice wrote:
> I love SpamAssassin! The amount of SPAM getting past it is almost
> negligible. So what happened here? This bit of SPAM passed right
> on through.
I ran it through my SA setup with the following result. The network checks
seem to made the difference. What's more interesting is that it has evaded
both our bayes check...
Note: At the time when you received this spam, the RBL may not have been
updated. Similarly for DCC and Pyzor, they may not had been reported. This
means it is very important to participitate in actively reporting spam.
Especially ones that did not trigger network tests.
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50%
[score: 0.4915]
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
3.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
2.9 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
0.9 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers
2.6 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
[66.81.85.195 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
[66.81.85.195 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
--
"Reflections on Ice-Breaking"
Candy
Is dandy
But liquor
Is quicker.
-- Ogden Nash
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
