--On Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:29 PM -0800 Chris Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if they are NOT assigned more weight, they should be. "if a message > is fed to the bayes db as spam, the URL's should have additional weight, > such that if they're found in future messages, the URL indicates with > more certainty than the rest of the content whether the message is spam > or not." I'm not sure if they are or aren't, but how 'precise' are you on that URI? Remember, http://www.spamsite.com/ref.asp?ID=32 is different thatn http://www.spamsite.com/ref.asp?ID=44 . So it would be tough to filter on URI's, as then you may have www.geocities.com/spamporn and then www.geocities.com/anotherspamporn. Just my .02. Evan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
