I suppose that would work. The job site isn't an MTA in the middle of a pipeline, it's originating the message. It's just sending it on behalf of one of its customers. Is that still considered a "forward"?
I imagine job sites do this to make sure all bounces and replies go to the customer so they don't have to handle the routing. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Porter Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: SPF Support in SA? --On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:04 AM -0600 Philip Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How would SPF address this kind of message? It's my understanding that a > DNS query would be sent to yahoo.com, which would respond with its outgoing > SMTP IP addresses - not containing HotJobs' IP - and cause the message to be > rejected. This is why the forwarder (in this case the job site) would need to use the rewriting rules described at the SPF site. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
