I have had this rule for a while because of all of the weight loss spam we
have been getting:
body CS_LOSE_WEIGHT /los[et] the weight/i
describe CS_LOSE_WEIGHT Add for losing weight
score CS_LOSE_WEIGHT 3
This is how SA scored the message below:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,CS_LOSE_WEIGHT
autolearn=no version=2.61
Looks like between AWL and BAYES_00 it correctly counter-acted the
CS_LOSE_WEIGHT rule. It doesn't mean it will happen in all cases, but in
this case it did.
Chip
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
> Santerre
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:32 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'; Timothy Donahue;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Weightloss spam
>
>
> I gained 12 lbs over the holidays and time off from hockey. I plan to lose
> the weight off again. But lots of people talk about losing
> weight. Some of
> these phrases would be in legit casual emails.
>
> --Chris (So far: no goals, no assists, plenty of penalties.) Santerre
>
(remainder snipped)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
