>-----Original Message----- >From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reading through a few of the last threads from people asking about >how to implement SA, I noticed how often it's suggested that people Use >Amavis or mailscanner, or similar to act as a go-between for the mail server >and spamassassin. I call SA from postfix. I'm using that box as a gateway, >and it hands it off to another box that does virus scanning. I was just >wondering if there are some advantages/disadvantages to this configuration.
>From my meager experience with Unix mail systems, it seems that the main advantage to using Amavisd is that a)you have a greater control on how the system treats spam email and b)amavisd is easier to configure than postfix in regards to spam-related behavior. Sorry if that's low on details or outright incorrect...I know just enough about mta/mda's to get our SA gateway box running. -Wayne ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
