On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Charles Tassell wrote: > I wonder if a better way to do this would be to add an extra field to > the rule (or maybe change BODY to BODY_STRIPPED or HEADER_STRIPPED) > which removes everything that is *not* a letter before doing the regexp > check. IE, does a s/[^a-zA-Z]//g) on the body/header before checking > the rule. I can't see it being too useful on the body, but it would be > great to catch those Per\scri;ption subject lines.
This is a different rule than the 'double-letter' spelling check. Again, I agree with the idea of scanning for excessive use of 'letter-punctuation-letter' or 'double letter'. That idea of mine for a COUNT based rule type keeps getting better and better...... :-) - Charles ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
