Hello,
I am using SpamAssassin 2.55 with procmail, my MTA
is sendmail.
Sometimes I get mails who are marked as spam but
they are not going
to the spam mailbox as I told in
procmailcr:
_________________________________________________
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
SPAMASSASSIN=/usr/bin/spamc LOCKFILESPAMC=/var/spool/procmail/.spamclock LOCKFILEPROCM=/var/spool/procmail/.proclock SPAMBOX=/var/spool/mail/spam :0fw: $LOCKFILESPAMC
| $SPAMASSASSIN :0: $LOCKFILEPROCM
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes $SPAMBOX ____________________________________________________
So I looked at the mail in my box market as spam
and found out
that the points in the header are different from
the points in the report:
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
---- Start SpamAssassin results 12.20 points, 5 required; * 0.3 -- BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up * 0.5 -- BODY: Message is 80% to 90% HTML * 2.4 -- BODY: HTML has very strong "shouting" markup * 0.1 -- BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.1 -- BODY: HTML included in message * 0.8 -- BODY: HTML font color is green * 0.8 -- RAW: Message text in HTML without specified charset * 1.3 -- trail of Received: headers seems to be forged * 0.5 -- Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.2 -- message body is 25-50% uppercase * 3.5 -- Forged mail pretending to be from The Bat! * 0.6 -- Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.1 -- Message only has text/html MIME parts ---- End of SpamAssassin results The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. _____________________________________________________________ Does anybody has a idee whats my problem? Thanks for any comment. Sven |
- Re: [SAtalk] points in header are different from points in ... S.Neukirchner
- Re: [SAtalk] points in header are different from point... Martin Radford
- Re: [SAtalk] points in header are different from point... Martin Radford