Thanks for the suggestion.
I checked in the logfiles and it looks like the 192.168.10 domain is already treated as trusted (ie. spamassassin infers automatically that it is trusted).
I see lines in the logfile such as: debug: received-header: relay 192.168.10.250 trusted? yes
Simon
At 02:28 PM 12/29/03 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:17 PM 12/28/2003, Simon Matthews wrote:Specifically, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK check. Note that 192.168.10.250 is a local (within the LAN) relay.
If you're going to use 192.168.*.* networks, add them to your trusted_networks statement and it should clear things up a bit.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
