Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The spam-checking process skips the Bayes-checking if the database is > locked (as blcoking on that lock for a long time would be a very bad > idea). This warning message is just saying that Bayes was skipped.
Right, so it's no catastrophe. But it does mean that spam that would have been tagged by the Bayes stuff will slip through while sa-learn is running, I guess. Would it be possible to add a switch to spamassassin saying "wait for the lock; don't skip the test"? I'm running spamassassin in a somewhat controlled environment; it's no big deal if spamassassin has to wait a while for the lock. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
