From: "Jennifer Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:01:25 -0500
>http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm Indeed, yours was one of the places I *had* looked. Forgive me if I'm confused, but it seems that your rules are looking for a variety of tag patterns. E.g. frobnoz<flibber>digibbet and mumble<frap>nuts are two separate matches. Did you find that a more general pattern missed too much spam or hit too much ham? I had originally considered / .+\<.*\>.* / ,but was concerned about inadvertently catching everything by accident. I'm hoping that doing this without explicit text strings combined with additive scoring will be enough to get these auto-learned. So to restate the second part of my original request, Is there a method to modify the score as a function of the number of hits of the same rule? CHeers! -sam ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
