>It might be convenient to view each these transformations as
operating on the output of the previous.
Indeed, I was. Elegance + Efficiency + Functionality = GoodCode(TM)
>Note that numbers are sometimes substituted for letters.
>[SNIP] This argues for phoneming and/or spell-checking before ALPHA-ing.
I figured just stripping them would be best, or with maybe an adjunct
dictionary for common ones.
HMMM, how about an additional "PHONEME" rendering stream. An SA 3.1 feature,
I'm sure. From my recollection of R.A. Heinlein's "Farnham's Freehold" (you
don't think my knowledge base is based on TEXTBOOKS, do you?!?) phonemes
have their own individual symbols, IIRC some are Greek like delta and phi,
something in excess of 100 atomic representations of voiced sounds. I would
think there is probably some kind of USASCII cross reference that would
allow them to be represented in a plaintext fashion. I wonder if there is a
Unicode/ISO page definition for them.
Best Regards, Bob
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
