At 03:33 PM 12/4/2003, Kurt Buff wrote:
I've also got Bayes autolearning turned on, and it's definitely active.

<snip>


Is there anything I can do to help improve the detection rate?

I'd advise not using bayes with autolearning alone.. Bayes more or less requires at least some hand-feeding in order to be effective.


Most autolearn-only bayes databases wind up being mostly poisoned and wind up doing more harm than good. If you're seeing any spam with BAYES_ scores under 20, or ham with bayes scores over 80 you've got big bayes database problems. Spam under 50 or ham over 50 should also be extraordinarily rare. Most should wind up on the right side with either 00 or 10 for ham, and 99 or 90 for spam.




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to