Gorm Jensen said: > Bayes is working very well for me, but I am concerned about poisoning the > database with extraneous, obfuscating words that many spam messages > contain. > > A few postings to this list say that there is no problem, but I don't want > to spoil a good thing. Are there some rules of thumb on what to sa-learn > and what to avoid?
I don't know if this is *ideal*, but I learn every verified spam I receive and all ham that isn't a mailing list. I'm very pleased with the results. Apparently I've learned enough; even heavily poisoned spam looks mostly spammy to my bayes database. -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases: http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
