The system is a P2-266 with 256 megs of ram and it handles ~2250 emails a day.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:39 PM
To: 'Matt Van Gordon'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

The FP rate for all of these is just about zero. I recommend popcorn, weeds, and backhair and see how it goes from there. Then take evilrules, cut the bottom half off, and see how it goes. Then try the whole evilrules.
 
How many emails do you get a day on the system? How much memory? CPU?
 
--Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Van Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

I run the spam filtering system at my company and I have been reluctant to add the new evil rules or any new rules since about a month ago when I changed the system so that spams where bounced rather than tagged.
 
If I added the new rules would I likely increase my false positives? Right now, with bayes, the system is working well, but I want to get optimal results. 
 
Thanks,
 
--- Matthew Van Gordon.

Reply via email to