> >No... it was something during the install. I remember the question about > >who to notify. > > That's not for email generation.. It's part of the tags added to spam messages. > > When SA tags a message as spam, it adds a bit to the body of the tagged > spam, which basically says "if you have problems, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > That's what that question is about. It has nothing to do with SA sending > email to the specified address..
Thanks - now I understand. > >I guess I could work out a procmail recipe. I got onto this track because > >of "false positives". 2.60 is pretty agressive about spam catching, and > >every now and then it nails a real message. If I could kick back an email > >asking that I be contacted directly, it would help with that problem. > > bounce-backs for spam are generally a bad idea unless done via a SMTP 5xx > error. If nothing else, you're going to get burried in double-bounces. I understand. That's one of the things I was worried about. But these false positives are a problem. I'll grant you that they seem to be running around 1 in 5,000, but I rigourously retrain my Bayes each night. I'm not sure that my other users do the same. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
