At Fri Nov 21 02:09:31 2003, Stephen Lau wrote: > > I've got a user on my system whose spam doesn't seem to be marked > correctly. It comes in marked as [SPAM] in the subject, but the > X-Spam-Status header seems to be incorrect. (SA works properly for > all other users on my system, so i'm not sure what the problem is) > > Example below: the X-Spam-Status is "No, hits=3.2 required=6.0" but > when SpamAssassin marks up the email, it clearly scores it a 9.1. > anyone have any ideas?
It looks like you're running the message through SA twice. The first run identifies the message as spam (score 9.1), and converts the original message to an attachment. The second run through SA does not think it is spam (score: 3.2) mainly because the original message's headers are now in the attachment. 3.5 points in the original message came from RBL rules, and of course those won't be hit the second time around. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
