-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Vicki,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 12:24:59 PM, you wrote: VB> Well, now I see the - in front of the 2.1. Though if the BAYES test VB> says the probability is 0 the4 Bayes test is really lame. I disagree. >>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=1.0 tests=BAYES_00, >> UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=ham version=2.60 What are your Bayes auto-learn thresholds set at? I'm guessing that some earlier spam, possibly several such messages, passed through your system with non-Bayes scores below the ham auto-learn threshold, and that's what caused your Bayes system to go out of whack. One of the first things I did with SA 2.60 was set > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 30.0 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -2 This is much more conservative than the default 2.60 setting, but it makes sure that NOTHING is auto-learned as ham unless it scores well below zero. Bob Menschel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBP8AWz5ebK8E4qh1HEQK/GgCgrwYmD4Yal73fnY5SPnamagadI40An0Rd EM9ZQYGWwsPgkxWQwg/7tPiQ =P3TT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
