> -----Original Message----- > From: Keith C. Ivey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Sanity checking new uri rules? > > > Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Possibility 2: bound the rules. I noted that the URI for > > > 16.com matched significant ham. Test for /\bdomain/ and maybe > > > it'll run a trifle faster. > > > > > > > Bounding of domains has problems. They don't really get bounded > > in a URL. > > Could you give an example? A domain name in a URL should never > have word characters adjacent to it, so putting '\b' before and > after should work fine. >
I think you just answered my own confusion on this!! So a '.' is considered bounded? As in '.amazon.com/studmuffin' I could use /\bamazon\.com\b/i and be faster? If so I will change my evilrules update for today right now! --Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
