On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> **************** eManager Notification *****************
>
> The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Love the stupid -PC- double-talk here. Gee, what was the content
sensitive to? (is it sensitve to light, heat, shock...)
How about saying "was blocked because it contains objectionable content"
and be done with it.
Sad. A spam-blocking list cannot even discuss the kinds of things
that it's supposed to block.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
