FWIW, This type of rule works fine for me with v2.55 and v2.60. The only difference I see is an enclosing parenthesis.
((__TEST1 + __TEST2 + __TEST3) > 1) -- Scott -----Original Message----- From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:51 PM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Meta rules vs. SA version I'm not sure if it is just me, but there are some new rules I have in the update that look like this: (__meta1 + __meta2) > 1 They don't work on older version of SA. they get an error when doing a spamassassin -D --lint. The '+' is throwing it off. I wonder if that feature is 2.60 dependant? Chris Santerre System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
