-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Kris Deugau writes: >"Cheryl L. Southard" wrote: >> Does anyone know if the "-m" flag is now more stable? We've since >> upgraded to Spamassassin 2.54 and Solaris 9. > >I don't recall hearing any bugs specific to -m, but I though I saw some >odd behaviour reported on Solaris. There were some bugs in 2.4x where x < 5, but 2.5x and 2.6x have been very stable -- they use a totally different child-counting method. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/mtweQTcbUG5Y7woRAvIOAJ9ifIfYtDLeUgPgXzovRiaWYY2csQCg6K2d /LeiXnkbJED5HJmPhfTXxMA= =6JgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
