Quite Frankly, with 2.6, the popcorn, backhair, and weeds rules, and a few other custom rules, I have had no need to run Bayes on our site-wide SA implementation. We are having huge success right now. In the past week SA has missed maybe 10 or so spam which is over 96% accuracy and with no FP's on my own email account. (I get LOTS of spam.)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Endries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: [SAtalk] implementing site-wide bayesian filtering > Hiya, > > I'm playing around with spamd for a few accounts on our mail server via > procmail and I would like to set up bayesian filtering. Everywhere I > read says that per-user is the way to go with bayesian filters versus > one big site-wide database, because everyone gets different spam and > ham, etc., though I seem to get the same spam as everyone else I know. > Anyway I'm not sure how to implement the training. I've been using > sa-learn, but it updates the database of the user that runs the command > (duh), and I would prefer to not give everyone a valid shell. Is there > any way to train the filter on a per-user basis without handing out > login shells? > > I would like to set up a web interface in our webmail and/or a cron job > to train for spam folders, but I'm not sure if this is possible without > changing the accounts. > > Thanks! > > -- > Josh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
