Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll bugzilla this tomorrow.
You should add it to bug 2584: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 I started looking for rules to handle that obfuscation method, but I've found that the one I suggested on bugzilla isn't that good. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
