But if your firewall supports state tables, you wouldn't need to this
correct!?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Litwiller
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] If you use DCC w/SA please read

So since I really don't know anything about the iptables firewall on my
mail server do you more details so I can check to make sure that this is
set correctly?



Dave Lugo wrote:

>Howdy all,
>
>It's been noticed that more mid-sized sites are using the DCC with SA.

>This is potentially very cool, as it means the pool of checksums will 
>grow, providing better bulk detection for all participating sites and 
>clients.
>
>However (yeah, there's a BUT here :), it seems that there are numerous 
>sites that aren't poking the necessary holes in their firewalls, 
>thereby wasting their bandwidth, as well as bandwidth on the DCC server

>side.
>
>For proper DCC client to remote server functioning, the following will 
>do the trick:
>
> allow udp local gt 1023 to remote 6277 allow udp remote 6277 to local 
> gt 1023
>
>
>Here's some semi-boilerplate* info I've sent a few sites:
>
>-------------
>Your organization's DCC clients appears to be behind a firewall that 
>allows outgoing UDP packets to distant port 6277 but filters responses 
>from those same distant UDP port 6277.  As a result, the retransmission

>mechanisms in the DCC client code try hard but never get answers.
>
>It might help to think of port 6277 like port 53.
>
>Feel free to use the public DCC servers, but please fix your firewall.
>It is increasing your DCC traffic by about 50 times.
>-------------
>
>I'm hopeful that a "do firewall $foo for DCC" in the SA docs, plus this

>friendly reminder, will help some or most sites that haven't yet 
>realized that they are rejecting DCC query responses.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Dave
>
>PS - for specific firewall configuration info, please consult the 
>documentation/readme/man pages/etc for your site.
>
>PPS - I'm not subscribed to Spamassassin-talk, so if you want me to see

>your reply, please cc me :)
>
>* boilerplate verbiage provided by Vernon
>
>  
>





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to