> > - Our users probably are not going to be able to feed spam/ham into the > > learning system in SA manually. Based on this, would you recommend turning > > on auto bayes learning per user, or leave it off as we did in 2.55? > > Its should general improves results, so if you have the resources to run > Bayes, it helps. Network tests also help.
Thanks. We do have network tests on, which help immensely. We're gonna test Bayes out for a bit and see how it does on automatic. Any issues with raising the "ham" minimum value from 0.1 to 1.0? 0.1 seems quite low, and I have hardly ever seen a spam score 1.0 or less. Rob M. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
