> I am one of those that don't believe in auto-reporting due to > possible > false positives. Agreed, there is the temptation though for a server that should only ever receive infrequent personal mail scoring ~0, to automate the reporting of very high scoring spam :)
> > However, the task of reporting dozens of spams certainly became > tiresome. I take anything tagged as spam, move it to a folder with a > procmail recipe and then check them to be sure there are no false > positives, then run them through a handy little c=script that > Theo wrote: > > http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/random/handlespam.txt > > And don't forget to grab the testrelay as well. Thanks, I'll take a look at this. For now what I'm doing is saving a copy of mail tagged as spam on the relay server so I can go in later to verify it, then report/learn it all using spamassassin -r, which sounds a lot like what you describe (except I use exim filters - don't feel like learning procmail :) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
