At 11:16 AM 9/25/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
     xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2
     autolearn=ham version=2.60

Notice that even though it matched FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 and BAYES tests are not supposed to be counted for auto_learn threshold purposes, somehow the message was still learnt as ham.

Am I missing something ?

auto_learn_threshold_nonspam is on the new default of 0.1



Well let's look at the score of that rule:

score FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 0.051 0 1.884 2.499

Notice that in both set0 and set1, it's less that 0.1. Thus the email scores less that 0.1 when evaluated for autolearning.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to