> Well they were being passed straight to the user since the courier
> mailfilter file was picking them out due to the size being > than 24kb
> so there was no chance for SA to parse them.
> 

hi

Not sure if the rules we have added in local.cf are wrong. We are using SA+procmail

header   LATEST_NET_SPAM Subject =~/^Latest Net Critical Upgrade/i
describe LATEST_NET_SPAM Bounce - "Spam from Microsoft"
score    LATEST_NET_SPAM 10.0

Even if the subject says "Latest Net Critical Upgrade" I don't see LATEST_NET_SPAM in 
the header of the email :-(

Is the rule I have added wrong?

---
B.G. Mahesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.indiainfo.com/

-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.indiainfo.com
Now with POP3/SMTP access for only US$14.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to