Yes, but life would be much more easier with SA able to delete the message? You don't think so? Here would be much less messages including subject "How can I delete the tagged message..." - for example, because every MTA is necessary to configure other way :(
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Satya wrote: > On Sep 17, 2003 at 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >When I first saw the SA, I marveled, why SA cannot delete the mail. SA can't delete > >the message. The possibility of the message deletion depends on the MTA you are > >using. If you use procmail for local delivery, you can teach the procmail to delete > >the message, if you use other program, you must teach your program to delete. :( > >Why SA itself cannot delete??? It would be easy for programming, or not? > > A *nix tool should do one job, and do it well. SA detects and tags > spam, and it does a good job. It is a filter. Let the mail delivery > agent handle the final delivery. > > -- > Satya. <URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/> > The option to override self-destruct has expir&*%#NO CARRIER > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
