I guess essentially what I am trying to do is check the reply to: because I am getting a lot of spoofs there, and it whitelists it.
has anyone found a way around this? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alan Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] plz help? question regarding to from and expressions. > At 09:05 PM 8/31/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: > > > >I'm trying to learn how to write certain expressions. > > > >I've tried several ways to do this, but have come to the conclusion i am a > >noob at this. > > > >I am trying to write a rule that checks to see if the Return-Path: > >=equals= the To: > > > >if Return-Path == To > > > >If someone could help me out, I'd greatly appreciate it. No success yet. > >but am learning :-) > > Sorry to say it, but what you want to do is fundamentally not possible in > an ordinary SpamAssassin rule. > > You'd have to edit the code and create an eval test in perl code to do > that. The old "from and to are same" rule was implemented in code, not as a > plain rule. > > Spamassassin rules are nothing more than perl regular expression searches. > As such, they have absolutely no ability to compare arbitrary strings > between different parts of the message. > > Now, being regular expressions you can do some really complicated tests > against a single part of a message. You can also use meta rules to see if > two rules are true at the same time. But you can't compare two headers with > a normal rule. > > The only proper syntax that I know of for a header rule is: > > header <symbolic_name> <header to test> =~ <regular expression> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
