Bob Apthorpe wrote: > Richard Ahlquist wrote: > > The only gotchyas are how to maintain it. Who decides who is on it > > and when they come off. > > Balancing anonymity and trust is difficult ...
I prefer the benevolent dictator approach, where I get to choose and to ignore the dictators of my choice. I have never met any of the list maintainers. For all intents and purposes they could be anonymous user 3948539 or some such unknown to me. What is important is the trust that is developed. If they cryptographically signed their lists and put them on a P2P I would be able to verify it was the same user I had been trusting all along and to use those lists. Being P2P it would not matter where I got it from. Being P2P it would make it almost impossible to shutdown. > I wish I had the time and competence for a project like this. I couldn't > find the time to help with mass-check runs for SA 2.6x :/ So many projects. So little time... I am in the same situation. Bob
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
