On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Dragoncrest wrote:
> > You'd figure by now that they'd get > the message that neither they nor their garbage is wanted. But obviously not. As long as people continue to respond to their spam by sending them money, then what message are they expected to get? That spamming makes money? I'd say they got that message. > On a good note though, this simply means that the spammers are > getting desperate and we're winning the fight, slowly but surely. :D > > The sharp increase in the signal-to-noise ratio in my inbox in the last six months would seem to discredit that theory. Sure, SA is tagging it, but tagged spam is still spam and it still takes resources to deal with it (CPU, bandwidth, etc.) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
