Marian Eichholz writes:
>As far as I can see in FAQ and manpages, there is no official way to provide
>the envelope-sender (the SMTP-"MAIL FROM:" argument) to SA for furtehr
>reference.
>
>There are good reasons to have the Envelope-Sender at hand:
>
>- the Sender: (as best bet) might be forged
>
>- the envelope-sender is lost after local delivery and not regularly part of
> the message
>
>- NDAs should not being answered (they have an empty envelopesender, but sender
>headers)
>
>Ok, You can partly rely on the Return-Path:-Header.
>
>So, what is the "official" SA protocol part to deal with the envelope-sender?
>If there is no one, how could we integrate it?
We currently support:
Envelope-Sender - qmail
X-Envelope-From - procmailrc says this may occur
Return-Path - Postfix, sendmail, rfc821
However we haven't defined one in particular that we prefer ;)
More details -- and suggested followup forum:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2142
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
