Hi Dave, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist
You are funny! > If a user has a procmailrc that tests for user in whitelist ie > > :0: > * !^X-Spam-Status:.*USER_IN_WHITELIST > $MAILDIR/rejects > > And if further such a header does exist but is a wraparound > line ie the USER_IN_WHITELIST is not in the initial 80 or so > characters ie > > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-93.4 required=5.0 > tests=BASE64_ENC_TEXT,BAYES_60,HTML_40_50,MIME_HTML_ONLY, > RECEIVED_IDENT_CACHEFLOW,USER_IN_WHITELIST > > Will it or will it not fail the above test? If it really is a wrap line, I would think it should fail. > If indeed the fact that it's a wrap-line negates the above > test from working, is there another way to filter? (I suppose I > could do a test that has USER_IN_WHITELIST anywhere in the headers > or body...) How about the following (hope it is right): EOL = " " :0: * !^X-Spam-Status:(.*$EOL)*.*USER_IN_WHITELIST $MAILDIR/rejects Anchor X-Spam-Status:, then zero or more matches of anything to the end-of-line, then anything to USER_IN_WHITELIST. At least this way it would be found close to the X-Spam-Status anchor. Let me know if this works or if I am out in space on this. --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
