--On Monday, August 25, 2003 10:41:08 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:34:09AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
You may want to look at the perldoc, as it seems to imply the {} are
necessary... (Are they?)

The doc was wrong, I already fixed it. The braces indicated that the headers were one of a certain set, ala add_header:

add_header { spam | ham | all } header_name string

where you can choose one of spam, ham, or all, but the choice was
non-optional.

report_safe_copy_headers accepts one or more headers on the line, so I
changed the doc to be:

report_safe_copy_headers header_name ...

Which is more appropriate.

Ok, that makes sense. I didn't see that change in the patch in the bug...


Let me know when rc3 is out, and I'll beat on it :-).

LER


-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to